A few years back a couple of friends and me decided to cycle a well known UK route called the C2C. As the name suggests it goes from sea to sea. In this case, from Whitehaven to Sunderland. We packed up our bikes with tents, food and other essentials and set off on the 4 day trip across the land, camping by night. It is possible to do the trip in one day if you are very fit, but we were not, and the additional weight of carrying what we needed to camp etc., slows you down, hence the 4 days. It was relative hardship compared to ordinary daily life, peddling our way across the Cambrian mountains, through sunshine, rain, fog and hail. The aches and pains of leaning on the handle bars, the bruising and soreness on your backside, revealing themselves more assertively each morning as you start the next leg of the journey, make for discomfort that us pansy-ass townies are really not at home with. Additionally, the late night sounds of your mates snoring and what I can only describe as half-goat-half-pig-half-goose mating grunts at 3 am in the morning, eminating from perhaps 20 feet away, amongst other strange noises, leaves you tired if not exhausted each morning. But still, we got on our bikes and peddled. On the upside, you see the country from a completely different perspective. You start to enjoy the rolling hills and peaks, at least when you're coming down them. You encounter people in a new context too. Folk are helpful, friendly and sympathetic to your quest, perhaps to some degree wishing it was them. By the end of the trip we were truly exhausted, though simultaneously elated at our small achievement, and enriched by the experiences along the way. But, something else had happened to us. We didnt want to stop. We didn't want to go home. We wanted more. What and why?
There was a comradery that developed, despite sleep loss and fatigue induced grumpy exchanges, that I have not experienced in daily town life. Something about the shared hardships and joys that creates unspoken bonds that we don't experience in modern life, save perhaps within the family home, but even then there is something different about this. There was more than just the bonds that made the experience so memorable and precious.
If we step back and look our lives and peer down from a larger perspective there are hints at why. We are constrained by having to pay for our homes and life in them, which forces us to take paying jobs, with our homes creating physical barriers to all outside the four walls. So for the most part of our lives we are either in our homes or in the place of work doing work, where the opportunities for the kind of experiences and comradery I'm talking about do not really exist. Furthermore we are bombarded constantly by marketing, everywhere, it is even piped directly into our homes courtesy of the box in the corner of the room. It teases us, manipulating our desires and emotions, making us addicted consumers of products, somehow dulling our brains to the fact that we are forced to pay all of our lives to live on a tiny patch of our own planet. The bricks and mortar having been paid for just a few years into our mortgages, and the rest just pampering the rich who hold our planet hostage. In this sense we are slaves to the rich. We are forced to live within their laws and ideologies, and skillfully manipulated and coerced into accepting this way of life.
Out on the road, we discovered something about freedom and friendship that is difficult to find or experience within the highly structured system of modern life that is imposed on us. Perhaps the fact that being on bikes, relatively unconstrained by road laws, allowing us to go just about anywhere also had something to do with it. I can't even adequately describe the meaning and joy of what we discovered. It is only something that can be appreciated by embarking on such adventures I think. But it changed me. It continues to change me. Every time I do something outside of the norms of the system now I feel that freedom and joy, and it's addictive. More and more I reject modern life; it's fakery, the celebrities, the rules, the slavery. And I feel good about it.
We can't continue our existing way of life. We already know it. The exhaustion of resources, the damage to our ecology, the wars that will probably ensue, the biological hazards, the nuclear hazards. If the constraints of wage slavery and these mentioned threats are not enough to compel you to change your existence, your existence will change anyway. The question is, do you want it to be on your own terms or are you going to let the terms of others, specifically the rich and powerful, be imposed on you?
My experiences have taught me that there is a much more fulfilling existence for us, waiting for us, beyond the walls of this fake life imposed on us by the rich. It will involve work too, but not this meaningless 'existance' as servants. We have to fight for our rights and freedoms, and that takes comradery and solidarity that doesn't come from ordinary modern life. You can experience it on an adventure, in protests and demonstrations, through participating in life with fellow ordinary folk. It creates meaning for your life that you wont find on your TV, in the supermarket or at work, but you have to seek it out to understand it. As the famous anarchist Rosa Luxembourg once said "those who do not move do not feel their chains", and that is something we cannot truly grasp whilst continuing to go through the motions of the life that has been designed for us by the rich for the rich.
Do something you have never done. Do something beyond normality. Understand what the word liberty means, and how we give it up by continuing with modern life. Become addicted to freedom and learn how to fight for it.
It is hard to convey to a population lost in the dream world of corporate media what kind of trouble they are in in this moment. The corporate Coup d'état is bringing the ‘free’ world the same oppression it inflicts up on the 3rd World, whilst taking us closer to world war every day and rapidly accelerating the systematic destruction of the planet itself. Ordinary folk must sit up, pay attention and act. Populations are stirring but we must shove the coffee pot under their noses right now!
Showing posts with label Responsibility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Responsibility. Show all posts
Thursday, 3 October 2013
Saturday, 10 March 2012
You fund it so they do it
People keep whining about their governments, yet you keep funding these
war criminals and thugs. If you follow the teachings of Jesus, he said
"let him who hath no sins cast the first stone", which means you are
supposed to pay attention to your own crimes and deal with them. But you
people just keep working for them and funding them with taxes. If you
want to change things, if you want to stop terrorism, war, oppression then stop funding it, and stop participating
in this corporate fascist nightmare.
U.S. Army prepares to invade U.S. NDAA
Thursday, 23 February 2012
Taking responsibility for yourself
Whether or not we are happy with this government and our local representative Karen Lumley, I believe we should think more seriously about our responsibility for what we do and what we can do with respect to government. What I mean is, tax payers are paying for what this government does and for what Karen Lumley decides on our behalf. Well, Karen is a human being and she will read your letters and emails and politely respond by letter as she has done with me (despite some previous rudeness from me, sorry Karen, my bad). If we don't tell Karen what we think about various issues then she is going to have to go by what she believes to be correct. In the absence of your voice to Karen, Karen is hearing the voices of the businesses and corporations that sustain her PR campaign with funding to her campaign and to the general cash box of the Conservative Party.
So bearing these details in mind, what is the most important issue right now, and what is our philosophy on the matter? We each have to decide for ourselves what is the most important issue and how our own philosophy relates to it. For example, the most important issue for me right now is our policy (yes, yours and mine) of supporting economic sanctions against Iran over allegations that they might have a nuclear weapon. Iran has a population of approximately 74 million people, which by some 'beer matt' math and assuming say 4 people per family, means there are approximately 19 million families being starved to death for refusing to stop developing their nuclear energy program, even though it is in complete accord with their right to develop nuclear energy for peaceful means under the NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) which they have signed and agreed to and are living up to their obligations. Interestingly Israel has not signed the NPT though it has many nuclear weapons, they regularly threaten their neighbours and are in the midst of the slow extermination of the Palestinians, yet we are not starving Israel to death. Then there is the fact that we have around 900 nuclear weapons, and as signers of the NPT we are contractually committed to eradicating our nuclear arsenal, but we haven’t. In fact we are planning to overhaul or replace this arsenal.
So, I'm really struggling with the philosophy of our actions and the message that we are sending to the world. We are participating in, what under any reasonable definition of the term is genocide, because we think Iran is scary? Iran hasn't attacked another nation for 200 years unless you count the period under the Shah who we installed as ruler to do our bidding. Iran has no nuclear weapons that we know of (despite what the US controlled IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) says) and we think that they are scary? How scary are we to others? I mean after killing a approximately 1 million people and making homeless a further 2 million in Iraq with our sanctions and invasion because Iraq supposedly had WMDs (actually we know they did at some point even if they were gone when we invaded, because we sold them the technology to do it), how scary must we look to other countries? Are we saying to the world 'if you seem scary to me then I'm going to kill you'? It certainly seems that way to me. But far more worrying is if that is the kind of behaviour we are telling other countries is valid, how should we expect to be treated by them?
Karen Lumley is a proud Christian and sits on a board of governors for a local faith school. The thing is I can't fathom how this fits into her Christian philosophy. I'm pretty sure Jesus didn't say "do unto others if they seem scary". It also seems to me to clash with Christian doctrine of "let he who hath no sins cast the first stone", which in my simplistic interpretation is the same as 'clean up your own yard instead of complaining about your neighbours', and would seem to me to map onto this issue as 'shouldn't we get rid of our own nukes before point our fingers at Iran?'. If what we are doing is meant to be what we would have others do unto us then I want no part of it. I have sent this very question to Karen and politely warned her that she may find herself in a war crimes tribunal at some point in the future if she doesn't publically conscientiously object to this genocidal behaviour.
Karen is currently sitting with our responsibility on her shoulders and if we do not tell her what we think then we cannot blame her for any of these actions. They are our responsibility. I have mailed Karen with my objection and would like to publically state that I do not consent to murdering millions of Iranian families because we think they are scary. Whether you agree with me or not, it is your responsibility to tell Karen (tellkaren.com) whether you consent to this behaviour. It's the only way Karen is going to know what you think.
If you want to take responsibility for yourself then to contact your MP all you need is your post code and this : http://findyourmp.parliament.uk
So bearing these details in mind, what is the most important issue right now, and what is our philosophy on the matter? We each have to decide for ourselves what is the most important issue and how our own philosophy relates to it. For example, the most important issue for me right now is our policy (yes, yours and mine) of supporting economic sanctions against Iran over allegations that they might have a nuclear weapon. Iran has a population of approximately 74 million people, which by some 'beer matt' math and assuming say 4 people per family, means there are approximately 19 million families being starved to death for refusing to stop developing their nuclear energy program, even though it is in complete accord with their right to develop nuclear energy for peaceful means under the NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) which they have signed and agreed to and are living up to their obligations. Interestingly Israel has not signed the NPT though it has many nuclear weapons, they regularly threaten their neighbours and are in the midst of the slow extermination of the Palestinians, yet we are not starving Israel to death. Then there is the fact that we have around 900 nuclear weapons, and as signers of the NPT we are contractually committed to eradicating our nuclear arsenal, but we haven’t. In fact we are planning to overhaul or replace this arsenal.
So, I'm really struggling with the philosophy of our actions and the message that we are sending to the world. We are participating in, what under any reasonable definition of the term is genocide, because we think Iran is scary? Iran hasn't attacked another nation for 200 years unless you count the period under the Shah who we installed as ruler to do our bidding. Iran has no nuclear weapons that we know of (despite what the US controlled IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) says) and we think that they are scary? How scary are we to others? I mean after killing a approximately 1 million people and making homeless a further 2 million in Iraq with our sanctions and invasion because Iraq supposedly had WMDs (actually we know they did at some point even if they were gone when we invaded, because we sold them the technology to do it), how scary must we look to other countries? Are we saying to the world 'if you seem scary to me then I'm going to kill you'? It certainly seems that way to me. But far more worrying is if that is the kind of behaviour we are telling other countries is valid, how should we expect to be treated by them?
Karen Lumley is a proud Christian and sits on a board of governors for a local faith school. The thing is I can't fathom how this fits into her Christian philosophy. I'm pretty sure Jesus didn't say "do unto others if they seem scary". It also seems to me to clash with Christian doctrine of "let he who hath no sins cast the first stone", which in my simplistic interpretation is the same as 'clean up your own yard instead of complaining about your neighbours', and would seem to me to map onto this issue as 'shouldn't we get rid of our own nukes before point our fingers at Iran?'. If what we are doing is meant to be what we would have others do unto us then I want no part of it. I have sent this very question to Karen and politely warned her that she may find herself in a war crimes tribunal at some point in the future if she doesn't publically conscientiously object to this genocidal behaviour.
Karen is currently sitting with our responsibility on her shoulders and if we do not tell her what we think then we cannot blame her for any of these actions. They are our responsibility. I have mailed Karen with my objection and would like to publically state that I do not consent to murdering millions of Iranian families because we think they are scary. Whether you agree with me or not, it is your responsibility to tell Karen (tellkaren.com) whether you consent to this behaviour. It's the only way Karen is going to know what you think.
If you want to take responsibility for yourself then to contact your MP all you need is your post code and this : http://findyourmp.parliament.uk
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)